Walt Hurley is a Professor Emeritus in the Department of Animal Sciences at the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. He has taught
courses, including his Lactation Biology course, at Illinois for over 30 years.
He flipped that course long before the concept of a flipped classroom came into
the mainstream of academia. His online Lactation Biology website has been used world-wide since the mid-1990s and is used as a
resource by many teaching similar courses. His contributions to teaching have
been recognized through teaching awards from the University of
Illinois and from national and international professional organizations.
I have taught an upper level undergraduate course in
lactation biology for over 30 years at the University of Illinois. Long ago, my
approach was to emulate those who had taught me as an undergraduate by
lecturing. By all accounts, I was not a bad lecturer, but nothing special. Eventually I got bored with hearing myself
lecture and thought how uninteresting it must be for my students. I thought that
there must be a better way. I have the advantage of having two 2-hour weekly class sessions, giving me
plenty of time to have class meet at the campus dairy farm, which is only a mile south of campus, or develop other in-class activities.
I experimented with a range of student activities over the years. Over 15
years ago I revamped the course to one where most of the content material is
online and students spend 75-80% of the in-class time working in groups on
case studies, discussions, projects, and various types of presentations. I have
done only limited lecturing in recent years. Since the mid-1990s I have taught
in a traditional class room with bolted-down tables, with chairs in rows facing
the front of the room, a chalk board, LCD projector and resident computer. The
room was designed long before students were bringing laptops or cell phones to
class.
Room 131 Animal Sciences Laboratory - then |
To conduct the in-class group work in that room meant that
the students had to figure out how to arrange themselves in a fashion where
they could accomplish the goals of the activity. I would start each semester
with a map of the room showing where each group was to form a circle. Some would have to turn their chairs around and face the
back of the room, or cluster up at the ends of the tables. Inconvenient, but
they did it with little effort and after a couple of weeks automatically would
sit with their group members and quickly arrange into their group area when we
started the discussion or activity. My role typically was to act as a resource
for their group efforts. I would continually walk around the perimeter of the
room answering questions, listening to their conversations to make sure they
were on track, or offering suggestions. Any group that sat in the center of the
room was always hard to get to.
Some of their presentations of solutions to various types of
cases involved developing what I call mosaics. They would make drawings
illustrating the elements of the case, their interpretation of the information,
and their solutions to the case. We would tape the pictures on the walls around the
classroom and they would be expected to walk up to the wall and explain their
drawings and conclusions to the rest of the class. This required some
logistical planning on my part to minimize the time it took for the class to tape
about 150 drawings on the walls. For
their project presentations, the groups typically would stand at the front of
the room and talk to the class.
Then something happened. A couple of years ago I was in a
campus meeting where they started talking about remodeling some
classrooms. In addition, there was
discussion on making some of the existing classrooms into flexible
collaborative learning spaces. The campus has since then called these iFLEX
rooms. Although there are several types of iFLEX rooms that
are being developed at Illinois, most of them have movable chairs and tables, lots
of white boards, lots of technology around the room, and less emphasis on there
being a “front” to the room.
Room 131 Animal Sciences Laboratory - now |
As it
turned out, our classroom was already on the list to be renovated. I immediately
volunteered it to be turned into an iFLEX room. Reconstruction started in the
summer of 2015 and we were able to start holding classes in the room in
January, 2016. We were able to expand the space a little allowing us to
maintain room capacity similar to the old room. There are 12 pods of 6 tables and
chairs each. All tables and chairs are on wheels. Ten pods are around the
perimeter of the room and associated with flat screen monitors. Nearly every inch of wall space between the monitors is covered with glass whiteboards. There is a main
screen at what is considered the “front" of the room. The instructor can
control all the screens with the potential for a group on one side of the room
to be able to display their work to another group on the other side, and all
other combinations of displaying around the room.
So now I have this fantastic collaborative learning space. I
was already doing a lot of collaborative learning in the old space. Have things changed? Absolutely yes. Many of
the activities are very similar to what I had been doing before. Now I
encourage students to bring their laptops/cell phones to use in their
activities. For example, on the first day of class I had an unplanned visitor
from South Africa who conducts study tours of Kruger National Park and other
wildlife preserves. Students were already sitting in groups. I assigned each
table one of the African Big Five animals to quickly lookup anything related to
lactation or reproduction and develop a brief presentation. Then I had our
guest share his personal knowledge and experiences about those animals with the
class. The new room made such an effort considerably more streamlined,
efficient and meaningful for the students. And, it was something that I could
do to take advantage of a last-minute opportunity with minimal pre-planning.
As for those mosaics, there no longer are blank walls on
which to tape their drawings. I now have
them gathering images from the web to develop a digital mosaic that we can
display around the room as they explain their conclusions about the case. One
observation that I made was that many students would make notes on their
laptop. Then when they were called on to talk to the class they used those
notes as their reference. While this limits their impromptu discussion, they do
feel much more confident in making their presentation and include more detailed
information.
Gathering material for a presentation |
I still do not lecture much, however, I often share
information with them about their projects and activities. It is much easier
for me to move around the room to engage with each of the groups. Easier to hand out materials. Easier for the
students to work on projects that require developing some physical outcome. By
default, students are sitting in a circle and therefore no one in a group gets
left out from the discussions.
What about their group presentations? To date they have only given one
presentation. I had them stand in the middle of the room while talking and
making their presentation. After the presentations they were challenged to move
around the room to view more closely the work of the other groups. I continue
to develop ideas on how we can use the room and the technology even more
effectively, and engage the students even more fully in sharing their work.
At this point, the responses of the students to the new room
has been very positive. Initially some had to get use to the idea that there
was no front of the room and that they could not just sit mindlessly and stare
at a point at the front of the room. They could choose to look at the various
screens, the projector screen or the instructor on the move. Some are still disconcerted by the expectation that they actually move their heads to look around the room.
How have other instructors managed? Aside from some initial minor
technical concerns of making sure the laptop that they brought in to run the
projector and monitors worked in that room, they too seem to like the room. I
feel that many of them who traditionally only lectured are starting to see
other pedagogical approaches that they might use in such a flexible learning
environment. And those who were already incorporating group work and other
activities into their courses are coming up with interesting ways to enrich
those experiences even more in this new environment.
What can I say! This is great after so many years of being
bolted to the floor. Every class session, I am coming up with new ideas on how
to take advantage of the room. I look forward to having those ideas keep
coming.
It is fantastic to see that the room you regularly teach in was able to be transformed! To my knowledge, the only rooms we have available with such technologies are in our libraries and can be a challenge to schedule in. I have recently scheduled two of my classes (at a another Penn State campus) in the computer lab to do some group research projects. It would have been wonderful to be in our normal space, but the majority of my students do not have their own laptops. Does anyone have suggestions on how to "flip" a classroom without a facelift?
ReplyDeleteWhat a great illustration of technology supporting the course objectives! Your classroom must look and feel so very different each session/topic. Though the approach you describe worked with "paper and tape", the new set up seems to work with less effort. What is the software used to manage connectivity to screens? Do laptops and smart phones connect?
ReplyDelete